An introduction of the right to the freedom of association in Malaysia by youth human rights defender Wong

An introduction of the right to the freedom of association in Malaysia by youth human rights defender Wong

Note taking: Doris Yang / Editing: Leah Lin

ACFA (Asia Citizen Future Association) is honor to invite Wong Yan Ke, the program and campaign coordinator at Suara Rakyat Malaysia (SUARAM), to talk about the current situation of freedom of association and press freedom in Malaysia for us to understand the current situation and trends of the shrinking of civil space in the country.  This is the record of the sharing of Wong Yan Ke on ACFA's report launch forum on 22 August,"Exploring Taiwan's Roles Amid The Crisis of Closing Civic Space in the Southeast Asia" during the ACFA 2023 Taiwan and Southeast Asia Civil Society Week.

About the speaker

Wong Yan Ke is a program and campaign coordinator at Suara Rakyat Malaysia (SUARAM), handling cases related to police misconduct and detentions without trial. He is also the coordinator of CSO Platform for Reform's Police Accountability sub-cluster, and is coordinating campaigns for freedom of expression, freedom of assembly/association and ant-itorture and elimination of custodial deaths. Besides monitoring cases and initiating campaigns, he is currently working on a socioeconomic research on detention without trials' detainees and their family members. Wong Yan Ke is also a participants in ACFA's "Exploring Taiwan's Roles Amid The Crises of Closing Civic Space in the Southeast Asia" research and one of the panelists on ACFA's "Taiwan & Southeast Asia Civil Society Week" report launch forum.

There are four groups of stakeholders who are most directly influenced by the limitation of freedom of association in Malaysia, that are: (1) NGOs (2) Political Parties (3) Trade Unions (4) Students Organizations.


(1) NGOs

The current Societies Act of Malaysia regulates that a society can be formed with seven or more persons. Looking at the minimum number of initiators to form a society or association, the requirement of 7 or more persons to form a society in Malaysia is much more workable than the requirement of 30 or more initiators for forming an association regulated by the Civil Association Act in Taiwan. However, the biggest challenge for the freedom of association in Malaysia is the excessive executive power of the authority; for example, the government authority has the power to decide whether to approve the application for registration, or whether to dissolve societies.


Furthermore, the Registrar of Society (ROS) under the Ministry of Home Affairs, which is the authority to approve applications for registration of societies, normally does not approve the application submitted by organizations working matters related to human rights and politics. There were only few organizations of whom the board members are influential enough (such as those who used to be government officials, judges, or foreign ministers) could be approved for registrations.

In response to such difficulties, many human rights organizations chose to register through the Companies Act as companies. For example, Amnesty International Malaysia was registered as a company after being rejected to be registered as a society by the ROS.

The fact that many CSOs have no choice but to be registered as companies has brought them a lot of challenges. For instance, many donors refuse to provide grants or fundings for organizations that are registered as companies. Furthermore, organizations that are registered as companies have to bear the burden to pay taxes.

Besides from the challenges in registration, CSOs who receive international fundings are subjected to stigmatizations through the accusations of being the representatives of Western countries or the Jewish agencies. The difficulties mentioned above make it challenging for people in Malaysia to exercise their freedom of association.

(2) Political Parties

In Malaysia, registrations of political parties that are deemed as opposition parties or causing potential threats to the ruling parties are rarely approved. For example, the Malaysian United Democratic Alliance (MUDA), which was formed by a multi-racial group of youths, applied to the ROS to be registered as a political party in 2020. The application was rejected by the ROS in January 2021 through an email without explaining the reasons. The MUDA later sought a court order at the High Court to reverse the decision made by the ROS. The court ruled that MUDA won the case, and MUDA was finally registered in December 2021.

This case shows that the Malaysian authority was reluctant to accept young and progressive political voices; and when people are deprived the right to form a political party, they could only seek judicial review as a possible path to assert their rights.

(3) Trade Unions

In Malaysia, unions could only be formed with the approval of the employers by each company. Besides, all matters related to unions are supervised and controlled by the Director General of Trade Unions and the Ministry of Human Resources. Therefore, union-related activities are put under the control of the executive power.

(4) Students Organizations

Due to the uprising of left-wing movements, a lot of university students in Malaysia actively participated in political movements in the 1970s and was once considered intimidating the legitimacy of the ruling party. In response, the ruling party enacted the Universities and University Colleges Act to control students’ activities. With the Universities and University Colleges Act, students are prohibited from standing in solidarity with peasants or marginal groups' movements. They are also prohibited from participating in politics and forming their own students’ associations. Instead, students can only express their voices through the Students' Representative Councils, which are under the control of the Vice-Chancellors of the universities. The Vice-Chancellors have the power to decide whether to approve or suspend students' activities, and whether to expel the students or suspend students' licenses for organizations. Once students' activities or licenses are suspended, they could only seek for judicial reviews to reverse the universities' decisions.

Wong Yan Ke has been an activist since his student days in the Universiti Malaya. On October 9 2023, the court found him guilty under Section 504 of the Penal Code (which refers to intentionally insulting a person and provoking a breach of peace) for a solo protest during his graduation ceremony in 2019.

During his graduation ceremony, Wong raised a placard to demand the vice-chancellor to resign for his racism remarks in the Malay Dignity Congress when he was receiving his bachelor's degree on the stage.

The university lodged a police report accusing Wong of disrespecting the ceremony and forbidding another student activist to participate in the convocation ceremony in order to prevent the protest from happening again.

The university's staff refused to give Wong his diplomat scroll and academic transcript with the excuse that Wong's scroll was 'dirty'. The activist was only allowed to collect those documents a few days after the incident.

Wong was charged under Section 504 of the Penal Code in February 2020; he visited the court for around 70 times from 2020 to 2023. On October 9, 2023, Wong was found guilty by the court with the fine of MR5000, the court requested him to serve 3 months in jail if he fails to pay the fine.

Wong's activism against racism should be encouraged; however, the authorities' prosecution against youth/student activists is a harmful act against the freedom of speech and an act of silencing student activism.

2023 Taiwan and Southeast Asia Civil Society Week/2023 台灣與東南亞公民社會週 (CN/EN)
About the Taiwan and Southeast Asia Civil Society Week “Taiwan and Southeast Asia Civil Society Week” is a platform organized by ACFA to connect civil society organisations and activists among Taiwan and Southeast Asia. The 2023 Taiwan and Southeast Asia Civil Society Week is an initial stage for C…

Read more

【招聘】即日起開放招聘一名國際交流專案專員

【招聘】即日起開放招聘一名國際交流專案專員

ACFA的宗旨是連結台灣與東南亞公民社會,一起發展抵禦公民空間緊縮的策略。透過研究出版、區域論壇、國際交流等方式,探索台灣在東南亞公民空間緊縮下的潛在角色。國際交流專案專員將會與專案經理與執行長緊密合作,這是一份充滿挑戰的工作,適合具備衝勁、有責任感且熱愛團隊合作的你加入。 職缺及申請方式 型態:正職人員,每週工作40小時。 地點:台北市,需要每日至辦公室上班。可能有出差需求。 薪資:38,000元以上,面議。 直屬主管:專案經理。 招聘截止日期:2025年5月15日(先到先審)。 開始工作時間:2025年5月1日起。 申請文書:中英文履歷、推薦信一封(不限長度)、自我陳述信一封(不限長度)、最高文憑pdf檔(敬請加註「僅供ACFA單次求職使用」)。 申請方式:請將上述文件寄信director@acfa.tw 面試流程:(一)筆試:攜帶筆電至辦公室完成筆試,大約需要三至四小時(二)第一階段面試(可以與筆試同一天進行)

By 亞洲公民未來協會 Asia Citizen Future Association
台北講座|當緬甸震災真相被噤聲,我們該如何發聲?——台灣獨立記者在緬甸戰地的視角

台北講座|當緬甸震災真相被噤聲,我們該如何發聲?——台灣獨立記者在緬甸戰地的視角

講座資訊 時間:4月29日 (二) 19:00-21:00 地點:台北市區捷運站附近,實際地點將註明於報名成功信 現場繳交 NTD.300,全數支持緬甸籍獨立記者災後生活 本座談為實體座談。應觀眾要求將增開線上座談,敬請完成報名以確保收到確認信與會議室連結。 報名連結:https://forms.gle/CQLST6KJ1SWqn7Uu 座談主題 2025年3月28日,緬甸發生芮氏規模8.2的大地震,死亡人數已超過3,000人;然而,這場災難的真實情況卻難以傳達至國際社會。在緬甸軍方政權的嚴密控制下,當地災民難以傳訊、外國媒體難以進入災區,新聞自由受到嚴重限制,導致災情與援助資訊無法有效傳遞——此刻,扮演關鍵角色的其中一群人,是那些冒著風險聯繫外界的緬甸獨立記者,以及願意為緬甸發聲的國際社會。 在這場講座中,我們將邀請長期深入緬甸議題的獨立記者楊智強,分享他近幾年在緬甸戰地的實地經歷。在嚴厲的新聞封鎖與網路管制下,緬甸人民如何努力讓世界聽見他們的呼聲,而身在台灣的我們,又可以如何支持他們發聲,並讓更多人聽見? 報名連結 https:/

By 亞洲公民未來協會 Asia Citizen Future Association
【緬甸強震】透過捐款給獨立、在地與受信賴的緬甸社區來賑災和支持緬甸人民

【緬甸強震】透過捐款給獨立、在地與受信賴的緬甸社區來賑災和支持緬甸人民

#緬甸人民不等於獨裁統治的緬甸軍方 #緬甸人民不等於電信詐騙園區 #緬甸人民是在自然災害與軍事政變夾縫間求生的鬥士 ❓在過去的幾天當中,你是否也曾經問過這些問題? 3月28日,緬甸發生芮氏規模8.2大地震,罹難人數持續增加,美國地質調查局(US Geological Survey)預測,罹難人數可能攀升至一萬人,國際特赦組織則警告,2025年將有三分之一的緬甸人口需要人道協助。然而,一向以愛心著稱的台灣,卻因近年國際詐騙犯罪猖獗、針對緬甸軍方的疑慮,以及緬甸軍方不接受台灣官方派駐的救災隊等因素,紛紛出現反對捐款給緬甸民間賑災的相關輿論,社群間一時被這些問題淹沒:「捐款給緬甸有用嗎?」「緬甸都是詐騙園區,這次地震是活該,不要捐款!」「你捐給緬甸地震的資源都會被軍政府拿走,不會到災民手上的。」「緬甸不讓我們的救災隊進去,算了,不用捐了啦!」 🇲🇲人民是最大的受災戶 自2021年緬甸軍方政變以來,大部分人民都在軍方高壓統治下生活,人民除了必須為生存奮鬥,也持續組織反抗軍事統治,因而面對法律與法外的鎮壓和報復。這次強震,對緬甸人民和人民的反抗運動來說無疑是雪上加霜,地震後緬甸軍方持

By 亞洲公民未來協會 Asia Citizen Future Association
全球數位人權大會ACFA圓桌| ACFA roundtable at RightsCon 2025 (English below)

全球數位人權大會ACFA圓桌| ACFA roundtable at RightsCon 2025 (English below)

我們將在 #RightsCon2025 舉行一場圓桌會議【探索公民社會組織與人權捍衛者在監控時代中旅行的安全政策】!(English Below) 活動資訊 Event information *需購買 RightsCon 2025 門票才能參加,講座以英文進行 時間:2月26日 (三) 9:00 AM 地點:RightsCon 2025 會場(台北國際會議中心-202B) Attendance is limited to RightsCon ticket holders Date: February 26, 2025 Time: 9:00 AM Location: RightsCon Venue (202B) 全球最大的數位人權會議「全球數位人權大會(RightsCon)」今年將在 #台灣 舉行!

By 亞洲公民未來協會 Asia Citizen Future Association